Overall AI probability
Use the document score to understand the broad pattern. Do not treat a percentage as a verdict about authorship or misconduct.
Penlify shows an overall AI probability and highlights the sentences worth reviewing. A free account lets you try the detector; the score is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text.
A useful review separates the overall pattern from the exact sentences that may need attention.
Use the document score to understand the broad pattern. Do not treat a percentage as a verdict about authorship or misconduct.
Find the sections with repetitive structure, unusually uniform phrasing, or other patterns the model associates with generated writing.
Review highlighted sentences for clarity, specificity, evidence, and voice instead of rewriting an entire document blindly.
Start with the context. A polished research abstract, a formulaic business email, and a short student paragraph can all look statistically predictable for different reasons. Paste the complete passage when possible, because a single sentence rarely provides enough evidence for a meaningful classification.
No detector can reliably establish who wrote a passage from the text alone. Human writing can trigger false positives, especially when it is formal, concise, translated, heavily edited, or written by someone using a predictable structure. AI-assisted writing can also receive a low score. Treat results as probabilistic evidence that supports review—not as a disciplinary decision.
If your goal is clearer writing rather than AI classification, use the free writing analyzer. It runs in your browser and checks readability, rhythm, filler phrases, and possible passive constructions without uploading your text.
Use sentence-level signals, then make the final judgment yourself.